Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) Guide
The QASP is the government's playbook for monitoring contractor performance. For contractors, understanding the QASP means understanding how you will be graded — and how to ensure you consistently earn top marks.
Every performance-based contract has a QASP. It defines the performance standards, how they are measured, and what happens when they are not met. This guide explains the QASP from the contractor's perspective.
100M+ government records · 300+ gov/news sources · Updated hourly
What Is a QASP?
A Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is a structured government document that details how the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) and other government personnel will monitor, assess, and document contractor performance under a performance-based contract. It translates the performance standards from the Performance Work Statement (PWS) into a practical surveillance framework.
The QASP is required by FAR 46.4 for performance-based contracts and is integral to the performance-based acquisition framework established in FAR 37.6. Without a QASP, the government has no structured way to verify that the contractor is delivering what was promised, and the contractor has no clear understanding of how their performance will be judged.
Think of it this way: the PWS defines what performance is expected. The QASP defines how the government will verify that performance is being delivered. The contractor's Quality Control Plan (QCP) defines how the contractor will ensure they meet those expectations internally.
Key Elements of a QASP
Performance Standards
Performance standards define the specific outcomes the contractor must achieve. They are drawn directly from the PWS and translated into measurable criteria. Each standard should answer three questions: What is being measured? How is it measured? What level of performance is acceptable?
Examples of performance standards include system uptime percentages (99.9%), incident response times (Priority 1 within 30 minutes), customer satisfaction scores (4.0 out of 5.0 on surveys), report accuracy rates (98% error-free), and on-time delivery percentages (95% of deliverables on schedule).
Acceptable Quality Levels (AQLs)
The Acceptable Quality Level is the minimum level of performance the government will tolerate before taking corrective action. It is typically expressed as a percentage, a frequency, or a threshold. Performance at or above the AQL is considered satisfactory. Performance below the AQL triggers the remedies defined in the QASP.
For example, if the performance standard is 99.9% system uptime, the AQL might be 99.5%. Performance between 99.5% and 99.9% might be considered acceptable but below target, while performance below 99.5% triggers corrective action. Some QASPs use tiered AQLs with different consequences at each level.
Surveillance Methods
Surveillance methods define how the government will collect data to assess performance. Common surveillance methods include:
- 100% Inspection — Every instance is inspected. Used for critical, high-risk items with small volumes.
- Random Sampling — A statistically valid sample is inspected. Used for high-volume, moderate-risk activities.
- Periodic Inspection — Inspections at regular intervals (monthly, quarterly). Used for ongoing services.
- Customer Feedback — Surveys, complaints, and satisfaction ratings from end users.
- Automated Monitoring — System-generated metrics (uptime logs, ticket resolution data, dashboard reports).
- Validated User Complaints — Tracking and investigating user-reported issues.
The surveillance method should match the criticality of the standard. High-impact standards (system availability, security) warrant more intensive surveillance than lower-impact ones (report formatting).
Contractor vs Government Responsibilities
Government Responsibilities
- -Develop and maintain the QASP
- -Conduct surveillance activities per the QASP schedule
- -Document performance findings objectively
- -Notify the contractor of performance deficiencies
- -Apply remedies consistently and fairly
- -Input performance evaluations into CPARS
- -Provide access, data, and government-furnished resources on time
Contractor Responsibilities
- -Develop and implement a Quality Control Plan (QCP)
- -Self-monitor performance against all standards
- -Report performance metrics to the government as required
- -Respond to Corrective Action Requests promptly
- -Identify and fix quality issues before the government finds them
- -Maintain records supporting performance claims
- -Participate in performance review meetings
The fundamental principle is clear: the contractor is responsible for quality control (ensuring work meets standards), and the government is responsible for quality assurance (verifying that the contractor's controls are working). The government should not be inspecting every output — the contractor should be self-policing and catching problems before they reach the government.
Tips for Contractors
Read the QASP before pricing. The QASP tells you exactly how your performance will be measured. If the QASP requires 99.9% uptime with 24/7 monitoring, your staffing and infrastructure costs must reflect that. Underbidding QASP requirements is a path to negative CPARS ratings.
Build your QCP to exceed the QASP. Your internal quality targets should be higher than the QASP thresholds. If the AQL is 95%, target 98% internally. This gives you a buffer for unexpected issues and demonstrates proactive quality management.
Automate metric collection. If the QASP requires monthly performance reports with 15 metrics, build automated dashboards that collect this data in real time. Manual metric collection is error-prone and labor-intensive. Automated systems let you catch trends before they become problems.
Document everything. If a performance issue is caused by a government action (late access, delayed approvals, facility closures), document it immediately. The QASP should account for government-caused delays, but you need evidence to support your case.
Propose improvements. If you identify QASP standards that are outdated, unreasonable, or could be better measured, propose changes through the COR. QASPs can be modified during contract performance, and the government often appreciates contractor input that improves the framework.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a QASP in government contracting?
A Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) is a government document that defines how the government will monitor and evaluate contractor performance under a performance-based contract. It specifies the performance standards from the PWS, acceptable quality levels (AQLs) for each standard, the surveillance methods the government will use, and the consequences of failing to meet standards. The QASP is the government's tool — the contractor develops their own Quality Control Plan (QCP) to meet the requirements.
Who creates the QASP?
The government creates the QASP, typically the Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) in coordination with the Contracting Officer (CO) and technical subject matter experts. In some cases, particularly when a Statement of Objectives (SOO) is used, the contractor may propose a draft QASP as part of their proposal, which the government then reviews and modifies. The final QASP is always a government document and may be updated during contract performance.
What happens if a contractor fails a QASP standard?
When a contractor falls below the acceptable quality level (AQL), the government follows a graduated response. Typically, the first step is a Corrective Action Request (CAR) asking the contractor to identify root causes and fix the problem. Repeated or severe failures can result in payment deductions, withholding of award or incentive fees, cure notices (FAR 52.249-8), show cause notices, or ultimately contract termination for default. The specific remedies are defined in the QASP and contract clauses.
How does a QASP differ from a Quality Control Plan (QCP)?
A QASP is the government's surveillance and evaluation plan — it defines how the government watches and measures contractor performance. A Quality Control Plan (QCP) is the contractor's internal plan describing how they will manage their own quality to ensure they meet the QASP standards. The contractor writes the QCP. The government writes the QASP. Together, they form a complete quality framework: the contractor controls quality, and the government assures it through surveillance.
Find Performance-Based Contracts
Search active performance-based solicitations with QASPs and PWS documents. Understand the quality requirements before you bid with Bureauify.