Opening in Bureauify…
ClosedRegulationMinority-Owned Small Business

Findings of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking on Section 126 Petitions for Purposes of Reducing Interstate Ozone Transport-Federal NOX Budget Trading Program, Rule Revision

Environmental Protection Agency

Closed
NAICS 541620
Source: Federal Register
OverviewIntelligenceProposals

Key Details

Posted Date
Response Deadline
NAICS Code
541620
Source
Federal Register
Contract Type
regulation

Description

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to amend the Federal NO<INF>X</INF> Budget Trading Program regulations to revise the allowance allocations for certain NO<INF>X</INF> Budget units subject to the program. In January 2000, EPA took final action (the January 2000 final rule) under section 126 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) on petitions filed by eight Northeastern States seeking to mitigate interstate transport of nitrogen oxides (NO<INF>X</INF>), one of the precursors of ground-level ozone. EPA determined that a number of large electric generating units (EGUs) and large industrial boilers and turbines (non-EGUs) named in the petitions emit in violation of the CAA prohibitions against significantly contributing to nonattainment or maintenance problems in the petitioning States. EPA also established the Federal NO<INF>X</INF> Budget Trading Program as the control remedy for these sources, determined allowable emissions for the sources, and allocated authorizations to emit NO<INF>X</INF> (i.e., NO<INF>X</INF> allowances) to the sources. After promulgation of EPA's January 2000 final rule, some owners, or associations of owners, of EGUs or non-EGUs filed petitions with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) challenging, among other things, the allowance allocations for certain units under the rule. Subsequently, EPA entered into settlements with these owners or associations of owners. Today's action proposes to revise the allocations in the January 2000 final rule for these units in a manner consistent with the settlements. In addition, after promulgation of the January 2000 final rule, owners of non-EGUs requested EPA to correct allowance allocations for two other units under the rule. EPA responded that it was treating the requests as requests for reconsideration of the two units' allocations under the rule and would propose to revise the allocations. Today's action includes such a proposal for these units.

Key Dates

Posted:Deadline:

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this regulation still open?+
No — the response deadline for this regulation has passed (January 30, 2001). Browse other active Environmental Protection Agency opportunities on Bureauify.
How do I apply for this regulation?+
Review the full solicitation documents on the source website (SAM.gov or Grants.gov), prepare your proposal per the instructions, and submit before the deadline. Use Bureauify to track the opportunity and get reminders.

Track This Regulation

Get alerts and track updates with Bureauify.

Track in BureauifyView on Federal Register

Intelligence

  • Win probability analysis
  • Competitive landscape
  • Incumbent analysis
  • Price-to-win estimate
  • Similar awards history
Open in Bureauify for full intelligence →

Data sourced from Federal Register

Search Government Records

100M+ government records — search across all categories

Findings of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking on Secti — Environmental Protection Agency | Bureauify