Findings of Significant Contribution and Rulemaking on Section 126 Petitions for Purposes of Reducing Interstate Ozone Transport-Federal NOX Budget Trading Program, Rule Revision
Environmental Protection Agency
Key Details
- Posted Date
- Response Deadline
- NAICS Code
- 541620
- Source
- Federal Register
- Contract Type
- regulation
Description
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is proposing to amend the Federal NO<INF>X</INF> Budget Trading Program regulations to revise the allowance allocations for certain NO<INF>X</INF> Budget units subject to the program. In January 2000, EPA took final action (the January 2000 final rule) under section 126 of the Clean Air Act (CAA) on petitions filed by eight Northeastern States seeking to mitigate interstate transport of nitrogen oxides (NO<INF>X</INF>), one of the precursors of ground-level ozone. EPA determined that a number of large electric generating units (EGUs) and large industrial boilers and turbines (non-EGUs) named in the petitions emit in violation of the CAA prohibitions against significantly contributing to nonattainment or maintenance problems in the petitioning States. EPA also established the Federal NO<INF>X</INF> Budget Trading Program as the control remedy for these sources, determined allowable emissions for the sources, and allocated authorizations to emit NO<INF>X</INF> (i.e., NO<INF>X</INF> allowances) to the sources. After promulgation of EPA's January 2000 final rule, some owners, or associations of owners, of EGUs or non-EGUs filed petitions with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (D.C. Circuit) challenging, among other things, the allowance allocations for certain units under the rule. Subsequently, EPA entered into settlements with these owners or associations of owners. Today's action proposes to revise the allocations in the January 2000 final rule for these units in a manner consistent with the settlements. In addition, after promulgation of the January 2000 final rule, owners of non-EGUs requested EPA to correct allowance allocations for two other units under the rule. EPA responded that it was treating the requests as requests for reconsideration of the two units' allocations under the rule and would propose to revise the allocations. Today's action includes such a proposal for these units.
Key Dates
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this regulation still open?+
How do I apply for this regulation?+
Track This Regulation
Get alerts and track updates with Bureauify.
Track in BureauifyView on Federal RegisterIntelligence
- Win probability analysis
- Competitive landscape
- Incumbent analysis
- Price-to-win estimate
- Similar awards history
Data sourced from Federal Register