Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments
Environmental Protection Agency
Key Details
- Posted Date
- NAICS Code
- 541620
- Source
- Federal Register
- Contract Type
- regulation
Description
EPA expressed environmental concerns about potential adverse impacts to water quality and quantity from road construction and timber harvest and aquatic resources in roadless areas, especially the Van Sant Creek watershed. EPA recommends that the final EIS include additional information on project impacts to these resources and on the drinking water supply. ERP No. D-FHW-F40407-IN Rating EO2, I-69 Evansville to Indianapolis Corridor Study, I-69 Completion in Southwestern Indiana and Corridor Selection, IN. Summary: EPA expressed environmental objections regarding the magnitude of impacts to wetland and aquatic resources, forests, farmland, and potential impacts to sensitive karst features. EPA expressed concern regarding future project compliance with Section 404 of the Clean Water Act and recommended the agencies reevaluate alternatives. ERP No. D-FHW-J40156-ND Rating EC2, US 2 Highway Transportation Improvements from near U.S. 85 (milepost 31.93) to west of U.S. 52 (milepost 131.24), Funding, NPDES and U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permits Issuance, Williams, Mountrail and Ward Counties, ND. Summary: EPA has environmental concerns about substantial losses of wetlands as a result of expanding the highway from two to four lanes. EPA recommends the development of an alternative with fewer impacts to wetlands and inclusion of sufficient information that is necessary to streamline the NEPA and 404 permit processes. ERP No. D-NPS-J61022-MT Rating EC2, Glacier National Park--Going- to-Sun Road Rehabilitation Plan to Protect and Preserve a National Historic Landmark, Waterton-Glacier International Peace Park, The World's First International Peace Park, A World Heritage Site, MT. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns with potential construction impacts to water quality, especially consistency of proposed road improvements with restoration and TMDL development. EPA also has concerns about potential impacts from disturbance to sensitive and fragile vegetation (e.g., State rare velvet-leaf blueberry plant), and wildlife and habitat adjacent to the roadway and near proposed visitor facility improvements. ERP No. DS-AFS-F05123-00 Rating LO, Bond Falls Hydroelectric Project related to Terms and Conditions for Geology and Soils, Water Quality and Quantity, Fisheries, Terrestrial, Recreation, Aesthetic, Cultural, Socioeconomic and Land Use Resources, Ontonagon River Basin, Valas County, WI and Ontonagon and Gogebic Counties, MI. Summary: EPA has no objections to the proposed terms and conditions for the Bond Falls Hydroelectric Relicensing Project. ERP No. DS-AFS-L61199-ID Rating NS, Salmon Wild and Scenic River Management Plan, Timeline Change From December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2005 and Clarification of Economic Impacts on the Camps, Stub Creek, Arctic Creek and Smith Gulch Creek, Salmon National Forest, Salmon County, ID. Summary: EPA Region 10 used a screening tool to conduct a limited review of the Salmon Wild and Scenic River Management Plan. Based upon the screen, EPA does not foresee having any environmental objections to the proposed project. Therefore, EPA will not be conducting a detailed review.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is this regulation still open?+
How do I apply for this regulation?+
Track This Regulation
Get alerts and track updates with Bureauify.
Track in BureauifyView on Federal RegisterIntelligence
- Win probability analysis
- Competitive landscape
- Incumbent analysis
- Price-to-win estimate
- Similar awards history
Data sourced from Federal Register