Opening in Bureauify…
ActiveResearch

United States Nuclear Manufacturing Infrastructure Assessment

DOE

Source: doe_osti
OverviewIntelligenceProposals

Key Details

Posted Date
Source
doe_osti

Description

This report provides a review and assessment of the existing U.S. infrastructure capabilities to manufacture on a commercial scale, the major components and unique materials required by the various U.S. designs for advanced nuclear reactors and small modular reactors (SMRs). The approach was to compare the needs of SMRs and advanced reactors against the capability of U.S. manufacturers to ascertain gaps that could inhibit U.S. industrial support for deployment of SMRs or advanced reactors. This report focused on the reactor plant designs being developed by NuScale Power (the NuScale Power Module), TerraPower (both the Traveling Wave Reactor and the Molten Chloride Fast Reactor to a limited extent), and X-energy (the Xe-100). To gather the information, MPR visited each of these companies and selected candidate suppliers to tour their facilities and conduct in-person interviews. Information was also obtained by telephone interviews, internet research, and literature review of technical reports. The overarching conclusion from this study is that the U.S. has existing capability or can readily develop capability to support and sustain most, but not all, aspects of commercial deployment of advanced reactors and SMRs. The greatest concerns for capability gaps in the U.S. infrastructure for supply of components for SMRs and advanced reactors are associated with reactor pressure vessels, steam generators, and fuel fabrication. Foreign vendors can supply reactor pressure vessels and steam generators. Issues with fuel fabrication are associated with uranium enrichment and development of fabrication methods for the innovative fuel concepts planned for advanced reactors. The technical capabilities of U.S. manufacturers appear satisfactory with the possible exceptions noted above. However, the capacity of the existing U.S. manufacturing infrastructure may be insufficient for a high rate of construction. Manufacturers contacted as part of this study indicated a willingness to exp. Authors: Kinsey, Stephen [MPR Associates, Inc., Alexandria, VA (United States); MPR Associates, Inc.]; Jessup, William [MPR Associates, Inc., Alexandria, VA (United States)]. DOE Contract: NE0000638. Subjects: 36 MATERIALS SCIENCE; Manufacturing Infrastructure

Frequently Asked Questions

Is this research still open?+
Yes — this research from DOE is currently accepting responses. Track it on Bureauify for deadline alerts.
How do I apply for this research?+
Review the full solicitation documents on the source website (SAM.gov or Grants.gov), prepare your proposal per the instructions, and submit before the deadline. Use Bureauify to track the opportunity and get reminders.

Track This Research

Get alerts and track updates with Bureauify.

Track in BureauifyView on doe_osti

Intelligence

  • Win probability analysis
  • Competitive landscape
  • Incumbent analysis
  • Price-to-win estimate
  • Similar awards history
Open in Bureauify for full intelligence →

Data sourced from doe_osti

Search Government Records

100M+ government records — search across all categories

United States Nuclear Manufacturing Infrastructure Assessmen — DOE | Bureauify