Regulation

Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; Regulations for Designating Critical Habitat

Interior Department, Fish and Wildlife Service

Source: Federal Register

Questions this answers

Sources

Source record

The underlying regulation record — supporting evidence for the object above.

Key Details

Posted Date
Response Deadline
Source
Federal Register

Description

We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS or the Service), amend portions of our regulations for section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act or ESA). Specifically, we revise regulations related to section 4(b)(2) of the Act. Section 4(b)(2) requires consideration of the economic impact, the impact on national security, and any other relevant impact of designating any particular area as critical habitat and authorizes the exclusion of areas from critical habitat if the benefits of excluding the area outweigh the benefits of designating it as critical habitat. These revisions articulate when and how we determine whether the benefits of excluding an area outweigh the benefits of designating the area as critical habitat (exclusion analysis). This rule reflects the Service's experience and existing case law. The intended effect of this rule is to provide greater transparency and certainty for the public and stakeholders regarding the 4(b)(2) exclusion process.

Key Dates

Posted:→Deadline:

Frequently Asked Questions

Does this regulation apply to me?+
That depends on the scope stated in the rule itself. This page reproduces the record; the official source linked below carries the binding text, the effective date, and any comment period.

Where this record sits

What else do you want to know?

100M+ government records — search across all categories