Research

Evaluation of Advanced Phased-Array Techniques: Interim Results [Slides]

DOE

Source: doe_osti

Questions this answers

Sources

Source record

The underlying research record — supporting evidence for the object above.

Key Details

Posted Date
Source
doe_osti

Description

Report: “Evaluation of Advanced Phased-Array Techniques: Interim Results”, August 2023 ML23216A009, PNNL-34622 Results showed that detection rate drops as microstructures/materials become more complex Standard PA had the highest detection rates overall Detection rates in the CASS-CASS mockups were lowest overall FMC had the most accurate length sizing in the fine-grained WSS mockups. All methods struggled with length sizing in coarse-grained mockups SNR vs method depended on the specimen type SNR was consistently high with standard PA SNR was consistently the lowest with PWI FMC performed best on fine-grained WSS A lack of data received from some Round Robin participants resulted in low statistics for many of the analyses.. Authors: Prowant, Matthew S. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]; Jacob, Richard E. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]; Hutchinson, Chris A. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]; Harrison, Joel M. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]; Holmes, Aimee E. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]. DOE Contract: AC05-76RL01830. Subjects: 42 ENGINEERING

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this record?+
It is a publication associated with DOE — published findings, a technical standard, or a notice. It reports results or specifications. There is nothing here to apply for.

Where this record sits

What else do you want to know?

100M+ government records — search across all categories