Evaluation of Advanced Phased-Array Techniques: Interim Results [Slides]
DOE
Questions this answers
Sources
- doe_osti · checked 2024-11-01
Source record
The underlying research record — supporting evidence for the object above.
Key Details
- Posted Date
- Source
- doe_osti
Description
Report: “Evaluation of Advanced Phased-Array Techniques: Interim Results”, August 2023 ML23216A009, PNNL-34622 Results showed that detection rate drops as microstructures/materials become more complex Standard PA had the highest detection rates overall Detection rates in the CASS-CASS mockups were lowest overall FMC had the most accurate length sizing in the fine-grained WSS mockups. All methods struggled with length sizing in coarse-grained mockups SNR vs method depended on the specimen type SNR was consistently high with standard PA SNR was consistently the lowest with PWI FMC performed best on fine-grained WSS A lack of data received from some Round Robin participants resulted in low statistics for many of the analyses.. Authors: Prowant, Matthew S. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]; Jacob, Richard E. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]; Hutchinson, Chris A. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]; Harrison, Joel M. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]; Holmes, Aimee E. [Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), Richland, WA (United States)]. DOE Contract: AC05-76RL01830. Subjects: 42 ENGINEERING