Research

Financial Analysis of the Smallmouth Bass Flows implemented at the Glen Canyon Dam during Water Year 2024

DOE

Source: doe_osti

Questions this answers

Sources

Source record

The underlying research record — supporting evidence for the object above.

Key Details

Posted Date
Source
doe_osti

Description

The Glen Canyon Dam (GCD) is a Colorado River Storage Project (CRSP) power resource that is a component of the Salt Lake City Area Integrated Projects (SLCA/IP). The 2016 record of decision (ROD) for the GCD long-term experimental and management plan (LTEMP) final Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) specifies criteria for GCD monthly water releases, daily and hourly operating limits, and experimental releases. This report presents a financial analysis of the Smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu) (SMB) flows implemented at GCD during Water Year (WY) 2024. These bypass flows were introduced by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation (USBR) as an emergency response to the growing threat posed by invasive SMB in the Colorado River ecosystem downstream of the dam. SMB are a non-native predatory species that pose a significant threat to native fish populations, including the endangered humpback chub (Gila cypha). The thermal regime below GCD, typically cold due to hypolimnetic releases from Lake Powell, has historically served as a thermal barrier limiting SMB establishment. However, persistently low reservoir levels in recent years have reduced stratification in Lake Powell, allowing warmer water to be released downstream. This has enabled SMB to spawn successfully below the dam, prompting urgent ecological concerns. To mitigate the risk of SMB proliferation, the USBR implemented a series of bypass flows in WY 2024. Drawn from a lower elevation than the penstocks, the bypass structures released cooler water downstream. These short-duration bypass flows aimed to keep temperatures cool enough to prevent SMB from spawning, thereby reducing the ecological threat posed by this invasive species. Although motivated by ecological objectives, these bypass flows came with financial tradeoffs. Releasing water through the bypass structures instead of the turbines at GCD reduced hydropower generation, resulting in a significantly lower financial position for Western Area Power Administratio. Authors: Ploussard, Quentin [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)]; Pavičević, Matija [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)] (ORCID:0000000265245581); Yu, Ao [Argonne National Laboratory (ANL), Argonne, IL (United States)]. DOE Contract: AC02-06CH11357. Subjects: 13 HYDRO ENERGY; 29 ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY, AND ECONOMY; 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this record?+
It is a publication associated with DOE — published findings, a technical standard, or a notice. It reports results or specifications. There is nothing here to apply for.

Where this record sits

What else do you want to know?

100M+ government records — search across all categories